◂ Latent · 潜
Application demo · Planning / decision
应用 Demo · 规划 / 决策

Architecture planning — multi-region HA migration

架构规划 — 多区域高可用迁移

Planning isn't about finding root cause — it's about committing to a course of action under constraints. In the same language, the primary plane becomes the decision / plan / tradeoff / risk roles — and the Grounding Contract holds: a decision that takes the primary plane must be grounded (hung on principles/load tests), or marked tentative (with "what would change this choice"), or left open.

规划不是找根因,而是在约束下选定一条行动路线。同一套语言里,主舞台变成 decision / plan / tradeoff / risk 角色——而 Grounding Contract 不变:一个决策占据主舞台,也必须 grounded(挂在准则/压测上)、或标为 tentative(带“什么会改变这个选择”)、或留作 open。

Migrating to a multi-region HA deployment — architecture planning
Migrate to multi-region with zero downtime, targeting RTO < 5min and controllable cross-region consistency
Initial planIn planning
Your question
Leadership wants a multi-region migration plan within 6 weeks. Pick one executable path under zero-downtime and cost constraints
My read
still forming — don't trust me yet…
Still unsure / for you to decide
Strong-consistency cross-region writes vs. eventual consistency + operational complexity
If the business can tolerate 50ms write latency, Phase 2 goes straight to strong consistency; otherwise use intra-region strong consistency + cross-region eventual consistency. It hinges on the latency tolerance of payment reconciliation.
I considered but ruled out 1 idea ▾